Discussion Board Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Discussion Board - Case Study Example In other words, Cole and Driscoll acknowledge that philosophy alone cannot revolutionize the mindset of a church organization when practice and identifiable roles are lacking. Another interesting similarity involves the impact of roles on leaders especially when they are imparting philosophical objectives upon the followers. Unlike Driscoll’s On Church Leadership that is often guided by religious doctrines and mores, organic contexts are free of dogmas. Therefore, both writers note that religious and secular settings should not hinder the nurturing of new leaders within the church. Alternatively, in organic leadership, according to Cole, mentors and re-energizes the follower by creating new practices and philosophies (Cole, 2009). Driscoll argues that church management is often hindered by lack servant leadership and succession plans by pastors. Interestingly enough, the writers might join hands in streamlining the ministry through recruitment of new followers dedicated to becoming leaders. This is through the empowerment of others as a key step toward enhancing the overall leadership vacuum. It implies that leadership debate by the two writers dem onstrates the shifting demographics determined mostly mentorship programs and strategic servant

Presenting A Properly Processing To A Jury Assignment

Presenting A Properly Processing To A Jury - Assignment Example The defendant must seek the help of an advocate who will help him or her plan and prepare for pre-trial. The advocate must understand the reasons behind the outcome of the trial and the conclusions to be made by the jurors concerning the evidence. The processes stipulated above should be adhered to so that judgment will flow smoothly. The defendant should be well informed of all the procedures. The defendant must seek the help of an advocate who will help him or her plan and prepare for pre-trial. The advocate must understand the reasons behind the outcome of the trial and the conclusions to be made by the jurors concerning the evidence (Dervort, 1999). The case files are then organized. These files must contain what is required during the presentation. The success of the outcomes depends on the components of the information available in the defendant’s files. The information concerning the case is now gathered. The defendant's advocate should be able to plan and hence conduct a tangible investigation to reveal the potential evidence. He or she needs to determine reasons behind the factual investigation, prioritizing the investigation, implementing the investigative policy and litigating the case at trial court (Edwards, et al., 2008). The defendant’s information is then analyzed and interpreted.  Pre-trial readiness follows. This includes getting the required dress code, how to present the story, keeping up with the developments like trial tactics, objections, jury deselection, and identification.